Reactivate Marcus Ilori before applying to Northlake
A dormant second-degree path reaches the hiring organization directly. Applying cold first spends the opportunity at its weakest dimension.
- 12 minutes
- highest leverage
Built to continuously discover, evaluate and prioritize companies, roles, signals and relationships — then determine what deserves attention next.
Illustrative demonstration data.
The system in two minutes
A short walkthrough of the system I built to identify opportunities, evaluate what matters, map the people who can create access, and decide what deserves attention next.
Interested in the system, the thinking behind it, or what we could build together?
rhinehart.brooks@gmail.com
Interactive demonstration
A 60–90 second walk-through of how new information changes the allocation of opportunity, attention and relationship capital.
Step 1 of 7 — Signal
Paired with a senior enterprise revenue hire 19 days ago, this indicates an enterprise GTM organization being stood up now — not next year.
What changed
$140M growth round announced (illustrative)
Supporting change
SVP of Enterprise Revenue hired 19 days ago
Implication
Enterprise GTM expansion may be opening
Two independent, corroborating public events.
New SVP of Enterprise Revenue joins from a public infrastructure vendor
Leadership pattern suggests a repeatable enterprise motion is being imported.
What the system decided
Flagged Northlake Systems as materially changed.
Why
Capital plus a new enterprise revenue leader is the pattern that precedes an enterprise seller build-out.
Key takeaway
Capital + new enterprise leadership suggests a hiring window may be opening.
Illustrative demonstration data.
Command Center — Daily HQ
Rendered live from a static, fully fictional demonstration dataset.
One material change reshaped today's allocation of attention.
Weakest dimension — determines today's move
Paired with a senior enterprise revenue hire 19 days ago, this indicates an enterprise GTM organization being stood up now — not next year.
Funding event plus enterprise revenue leadership raised Timing and Wealth. Access stayed low, so the recommended move shifted from applying to activating a relationship.
Northlake Systems · Net-new enterprise logos, platform-led deals
Compensation
$180K base / $360K OTE (illustrative)
Work model
Austin, TX · Hybrid — 3 days onsite
A dormant second-degree path reaches the hiring organization directly. Applying cold first spends the opportunity at its weakest dimension.
Access path
Marcus Ilori · Director, Enterprise Sales
Warm-but-dormant path. Previously worked alongside a shared former colleague; a single reactivation message reaches the hiring org directly.
Effort
12 minutes
Relationship before application · Last exchange 14 months ago
Today
A dormant second-degree path reaches the hiring organization directly. Applying cold first spends the opportunity at its weakest dimension.
A one-page point of view on their enterprise motion converts the referral conversation into a candidate-of-record moment.
Sequencing matters more than speed here. A referred application enters review with materially different weight.
Capital plus new senior revenue leadership almost always precedes an enterprise seller build-out. Entering before the org is fully staffed maximizes both leverage and equity timing.
No other portfolio changes require attention today.
Quiet dimensions stay gray on purpose. Color is reserved for decisions.
Illustrative demonstration data.
The system
Market information enters once. It is discovered, interpreted, scored, connected and resolved into a single prioritized action — then the outcome feeds back in.
Public market activity, company trajectory, leadership movement and product momentum enter as raw, unstructured information.
Specialized discovery workflows run continuously rather than on demand.
Determine what changed — and whether it matters enough to affect a decision.
Separate models evaluate the same opportunity from different angles, so tradeoffs stay visible.
Entities are connected, not filed. A single change propagates to everything related to it.
The graph is resolved into three executive questions every morning.
Decisions, applications, outreach, follow-ups and score history feed the operating system forward.
What makes it different
Each one changes how information is treated after it arrives.
Finding a company or a role only starts evaluation. Nothing earns attention until it has been scored against the alternatives.
Fit, Timing, Wealth, Momentum and Access frequently point in different directions. The score's job is to expose that conflict, not hide it.
A strong opportunity with weak access requires relationship activation before application. Access is modeled as a dimension, not an afterthought.
A signal only counts when it changes priority, timing or the next action. Anything else is a notification.
Decision models
Every opportunity is evaluated by separate models, then composed into a single index that can always be decomposed.
Opportunity Score
Overall attractiveness of the opportunity.
Career Score
Quality of the career opportunity itself.
Wealth Score
Compensation and equity asymmetry.
Stability Score
Probability of durable company success.
Momentum Score
Current trajectory and rate of change.
Networking / Access Score
Ability to create credible access.
Personal Fit Score
Match between the opportunity and my experience.
Timing Score
Whether now is the right moment to move.
The point is not mathematical theater. Separate dimensions expose why an opportunity is attractive and what strategy it requires — a 92 driven by Timing demands a different move than a 92 driven by Fit.
Why I built it
I built AI Opportunity Intelligence because navigating the AI market had become an intelligence problem, not a job-search problem.
Companies were emerging quickly. Funding, leadership changes, product momentum, new roles and relationships were constantly changing the opportunity landscape.
Traditional job boards answer one question: what jobs are open? I needed a system that answered a harder one — where should I place my time, attention and relationship capital, and why?
What began as a system for navigating my own move deeper into enterprise AI became an operating system that continuously discovers opportunities, evaluates them, maps access, monitors change and converts intelligence into action.
Job boards answer
What jobs are open?
Where should I place my time, attention and relationship capital — and why?
What building it demonstrates
The product is the evidence — every item below maps to something shown earlier on this page.
Turning an ambiguous operating problem into a persistent intelligence system rather than a one-off tool.
Seen in: the intelligence loop, not a search box.
Specialized discovery, trigger, scoring and follow-up workflows that operate as one system with a shared graph.
Seen in: Radars → Trigger Intelligence → Decision Engines.
Converting unstructured market information into entities, signals, relationships, scores and decisions.
Seen in: the Opportunity Graph.
AI discovers, synthesizes and recommends. Consequential career and relationship decisions stay human.
Seen in: recommended moves that require approval, not automation.
Separating Opportunity, Career, Wealth, Stability, Momentum, Access, Fit and Timing instead of collapsing judgment into one unexplained score.
Seen in: Access as the limiting dimension in step 3.
Treating companies and career opportunities like strategic enterprise accounts: research, qualification, stakeholder mapping, timing and penetration strategy.
Seen in: the War Room and the Access Map.
Designing Daily HQ around three executive questions instead of a dashboard of metrics.
Seen in: what changed, why it matters, what to do.
Human + AI operating model
The goal isn't to automate judgment. It's to give judgment better intelligence.
Evolution
Each layer exists because the previous workflow exposed a new decision problem — not because a feature list was planned up front.
Manual research produced notes, not comparisons.
Comparisons needed a consistent basis across very different companies.
Company interest was useless without knowing when roles actually opened.
Roles and signals were fragmented; each opportunity needed one synthesized thesis.
A thesis without access is unusable. Stakeholders had to become first-class entities.
Static evaluations aged badly. The system had to notice what changed.
Change only mattered if I could see movement and close the loop on commitments.
Too much intelligence, too little direction. Attention needed a daily allocation.
The layers were one system: intelligence in, prioritized action out.
I'm interested in the companies building the next generation of enterprise AI — particularly where complex technology, enterprise customers and evolving GTM models intersect.
The product experience shown here uses fictionalized demonstration data to protect private operating information. No production systems, records or private information are connected to this page.